A.R.T.

About this blog

Andrew Sharp

A.R.T is the International Air Rail Organisation's blog, with news, articles and comment on all things related to air rail links world-wide. Your comments and thoughts are welcome: for obvious reasons, they will be moderated and may be edited.


<  Feb 2012  >
M T W T F S S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29        

Search

Categories

Recent Articles

Archives

Friends of A.R.T

Syndicate this blog

What is RSS?

FeedBurner
Subscribe to A.R.T by Email

Other Links

Visit Blogcatalog.com - opens in new window

Blog Directory by Blog Flux

Travel

My Zimbio
Top Stories

Hate Spammers? Check this out - opens in new window

We Support Wikipedia
Wikipedia Affliate Button

Visit the b2evolution website (opens in new window)

Jul10

You don't have to stop all trains at all stations ...

Permalink | 10/07/09 | Categories: Railways, Safety/Security | by: A Sharp English (UK)

I've sometimes discussed the optimal use of main-line railways with American friends, and put across the concept of trains with different stopping patterns sharing the same tracks.

The one which used to work nicely was on the Midland Main Line, running north from London St. Pancras. The pattern was that a semi-fast train would leave for Nottingham (180 km) and call at principal stations to Leicester (160 km). At Leicester, it would wait a few minutes for the following train (going to Sheffield, 270 km from London, via Derby, 200 km from London). This ran non-stop from St. Pancras to Leicester and then stopped at the adjacent platform to the Nottingham train.

Passengers from intermediate stations going to Sheffield could make a simple cross-platform interchange at Leicester. Passengers wanting a fast service from London to Nottingham could catch the non-stop train to Leicester then cross the platform to the train which had left London before theirs. The service was pretty optimal for all concerned.

A similar concept is used today by Eurostar. Their big constraint is the Channel Tunnel: their optimal speed is higher than that of Eurotunnel's shuttles so it's best to run the Eurostar trains close together - a technique known as flighting.

At 10:57, a Brussels train leaves St. Pancras. Just over 15 minutes later it stops at Ebbsfleet for passengers from south-east London. While it's standing in the station it is overtaken by the 11:00 non-stop train from St. Pancras to Paris. The two trains then travel some 3 minutes apart through Kent and the Channel Tunnel to Lille, where the Brussels and Paris routes separate.

A very nice use of scarce infrastructure!

Recommend this article to StumbleUpon.com 
(opens in new browser window)
Permalink | Add or view comment Add or view comments | 2 comments2 comments

Comments & Pingbacks:

Phil McKenzie [Visitor] | http://www.netpark-ltd.co.uk
An interesting article.
Permalink  | Posted on: 13/07/09 @ 15:27
Joseph J. Snyder [Visitor]
A double-track HSR rail system (whether 110 mph or 150 mph plus) with high-speed crossovers allows an operation that includes variable stops, variable speeds for trains, and in effect functions like four tracks if properly designed and handled.

This is appropriate in USA and elsewhere.
Permalink  | Posted on: 13/07/09 @ 18:04

Comments are closed for this post.