A.R.T.

About this blog

Andrew Sharp

A.R.T is the International Air Rail Organisation's blog, with news, articles and comment on all things related to air rail links world-wide. Your comments and thoughts are welcome: for obvious reasons, they will be moderated and may be edited.


<  May 2012  >
M T W T F S S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Search

Categories

Recent Articles

Archives

Friends of A.R.T

Syndicate this blog

What is RSS?

FeedBurner
Subscribe to A.R.T by Email

Other Links

Visit Blogcatalog.com - opens in new window

Blog Directory by Blog Flux

Travel

My Zimbio
Top Stories

Hate Spammers? Check this out - opens in new window

We Support Wikipedia
Wikipedia Affliate Button

Visit the b2evolution website (opens in new window)

Aug06

Fort Worth - Big Dig

Permalink | 06/08/09 | Categories: Railways, Environment | by: A Sharp English (UK)

One of the worst railway bottlenecks in the United States is just west of Fort Worth, Texas, where major east-west and north-south lines cross on the level at a location known as Tower 55.

Given the American passion for long, slow, double-stack container trains and the like, the potential for delays is considerable.

The obvious solution is grade separation. The local highway geography does not favour a rail-over-rail bridge, so a 3 kilometre long rail-under-rail trench is proposed.

The trench would be 10 metres deep and 18 metres wide, and would run east-west. Construction would necessitate reconstruction of some local streets: local people oppose this.

Building it north-south rather than east-west would achieve the same objective, and would have the advantage that it would be less disruptive to the community and could be built on railway owned land. However, it would dislocate rail traffic in the short term while it was being built, and would be more expensive operationally in the long term because of the gradient which would face northbound trains.

Maybe a solution is to deck over the trench - for parkland, for commercial development, for community facilites, for car parking. Sure, it would need good ventilation because of the use of diesel traction, but that is manageable.

Certainly it would be good to see a solution to the problem: it is currently very disruptive to the two main freight railways, BNSF and Union Pacific, as well as to Amtrak.

Recommend this article to StumbleUpon.com 
(opens in new browser window)
Permalink |

Comments:

No Comments for this post yet...

Comments are closed for this post.